#14099: Adding Method for testing avoidance in posets
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: chrisjamesberg | Owner: rowland
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: posets, days45 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Chris Berg
Authors: Eric Rowland, Alejandro Morales | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Old description:
> This is a test for finite posets to check if the do not have induced
> posets each of which isomorphic to two disjoint chains. Example 3+1 free,
> 2+2 free.
New description:
This is a test for finite posets to check if they do not have induced
posets isomorphic to the union of two disjoint chains. Example 3+1 free,
2+2 free.
Apply:
* [attachment:poset_functionality_14099-er.patch]
--
Comment (by chapoton):
instruction for the bot:
Apply poset_functionality_14099-er.patch
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14099#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
