#14704: Use GMP's mpz_t for bitsets
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: Stefan | Owner: jason
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-wishlist
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment (by robertwb):
The only way to know for sure is to code something up and compare
performance, until then all discussion is rather hypothetical (and I could
see things going both ways, but probably would place my bet on mpz_t.)
Note that mpz_t could be a member of the bitset struct (if indeed another
struct is needed) which would avoid one level of indirection. It may be
worth looking at using the mpn structures directly for this low-level
behavior as well.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14704#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
