#13768: upgrade polymake to version 2.12-rc3
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  tkluck              |         Owner:  tbd         
           Type:  enhancement         |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major               |     Milestone:  sage-5.10   
      Component:  packages: standard  |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:                      |   Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A                 |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:  Timo Kluck          |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:  #13767              |      Stopgaps:              
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by tkluck):

 Replying to [comment:18 kcrisman]:
 > Anyway, for this ticket it would be helpful to find a way to do it
 ''with'' readline.

 I think that Sage's polymake interface through pexpect (on the sage side)
 and readline (on the polymake side) is currently broken anyway,
 independent of this upgrade. IIRC, the current polymake package fails to
 install in recent versions of sage. And on the other hand, the new version
 of polymake from this ticket doesn't work with the current library code:
 it outputs copyright info to stderr, which sage interprets as an error
 having occurred.

 So in fact, I'm not sure if we really need to try to make the
 pexpect/readline interface work, when there's already efforts underway for
 replacing it by the shared library interface from the new version of
 polymake. That is to say, I'm not inclined to spend much time on that.

 (This is an example of a ticket needing a simultaneous change in a package
 and in the sage library code. For these tickets, the transition to a
 unified repository is very useful.)

 > But how do we disable it needing that - is there yet ''another''
 configure option that would disable it?
 The polymake configure script will only ''warn'' about cpan packages not
 being available, and it will still install without them. As long as we
 don't use the readline features, and as long as we ask the user to install
 those other packages from cpan, there is no problem. That is, if those
 other packages install correctly on MacOS. Do they?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13768#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to