#14573: Implement path realization for affine crystals
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim                   |         Owner:  sage-combinat      
          
           Type:  enhancement              |        Status:  needs_work         
          
       Priority:  major                    |     Milestone:  sage-5.11          
          
      Component:  combinatorics            |    Resolution:                     
          
       Keywords:  affine crystals, days49  |   Work issues:                     
          
Report Upstream:  N/A                      |     Reviewers:  Ben Salisbury, 
Anne Schilling
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw         |     Merged in:                     
          
   Dependencies:  #14402                   |      Stopgaps:                     
          
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------

Comment (by aschilling):

 Hi Travis,

 I have some further comments:

 - The commit message is the merge of two patches; you might want to edit
 it!

 - There is a typo "canonial" -> canonical

 - Please explain what you mean by the bar on the weights. Also it would be
 a good idea to mention that `\Lambda_i` are the fundamental weights.

 - Please mention that you are using the anti-Kashiwara convention for
 tensor factors (since I think your documentation differs in this from some
 of the literature and this might be confusing to users).

 - Perhaps use capital `N` also in the equation before the sentence "We
 note by Lemma 10.6.2 in [HK02] ....".

 - The documentation says B is a list of perfect crystals. But as far as I
 can see, in the examples the input is a single crystal. Could you please
 clarify? As I told Travis at some point in person, I think it would be a
 good idea to allow a list of crystals of the same level. If
 [B1,B2,....,Bk] would be such a list, one would use `\cdots \otimes B_1
 \otimes B_2 \otimes \cdots B_k \otimes B_1 \otimes \cdots B_k \otimes
 B(\lambda)` as the model for the affine highest weight crystal.

 - Could you add the affine grading? This would be useful since it is equal
 to the energy function!

 Thank you,

 Anne

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14573#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to