#9439: hyperbolic geometry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
       Reporter:  vdelecroix                                                  | 
        Owner:  vdelecroix  
           Type:  enhancement                                                 | 
       Status:  new         
       Priority:  major                                                       | 
    Milestone:  sage-5.11   
      Component:  geometry                                                    | 
   Resolution:              
       Keywords:  hyperbolic geometry, Poincare disc, upper half plane, sd35  | 
  Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A                                                         | 
    Reviewers:  Johan Bosman
        Authors:  Vincent Delecroix, Martin Raum                              | 
    Merged in:              
   Dependencies:                                                              | 
     Stopgaps:              
------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Comment (by glaun):

 Hi Vincent,

 I've addressed issues 1-4, and I was hoping you wouldn't mind giving me
 some guidance about how to handle the remaining issues.  Specifically, I
 have the following questions:

 1) Should I post a patch for the fixes of 1-4?  Or should I wait until I
 fix the remaining issues?  More generally, should I err on the side of
 posting more patches (so more people can help) or posting only ones that
 seem more significant?

 2) I like the structure of your code, and I aim to emulate it.  Does it
 make sense for me to combine your class structure with the features in
 mine and post it in skeletal form before fixing all of the functions?  For
 example, I could post a class diagram, or just an outline of the modules
 with the guts removed. Or is this step likely to be more work with little
 payoff?  I would ideally like the structure to be as democratically
 decided as possible.

 3) I find your usage of HyperbolicPlane for the upper half plane to be
 confusing since the HyperbolicDisc is also topologically a plane.  I'm
 used to referring to both as the hyperbolic plane, and I typically
 differentiate them by specifying which model of the plane.  I have been
 using the abbreviations UHP, PD, KM, and HM which were just decided by
 fiat to be short and convenient.  Is there anything you dislike about this
 approach to naming?  I worry that HyperbolicUHP is too cryptic, but
 HyperbolicUpperHalfPlane is too long.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9439#comment:26>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to