#11360: The Rubik's Cube group in Sage doesn't support many basic operations 
for a
dumb reason.
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
       Reporter:  was               |         Owner:  jason, ncohen, rlm
           Type:  enhancement       |        Status:  needs_work        
       Priority:  minor             |     Milestone:  sage-5.11         
      Component:  group theory      |    Resolution:                    
       Keywords:                    |   Work issues:                    
Report Upstream:  N/A               |     Reviewers:  Nathann Cohen     
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw  |     Merged in:                    
   Dependencies:                    |      Stopgaps:                    
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------

Comment (by tscrim):

 Updated patch addressing your comments. The `__str__` and `__repr__`
 methods were like that before I got there, and it is perfectly valid (if
 slightly wonky) to do so in python. However I think this is worthwhile to
 change. I documented the `parse` argument, which is simply passed to the
 `__call__`; I'm not in favor of documenting things like this since it
 could render the code unsafe and its telling the (average) user can set
 this, rather than those needing every drop of speed. Anyways, I added the
 doc since it's not a big deal here.

 For patchbot:

 Apply: trac_11360-cubegroup-ts.patch

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11360#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to