#14973: New functions for binary linear codes
---------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: veronica | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: coding theory | Resolution:
Keywords: binary codes | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Dependencies:
Stopgaps: |
---------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by veronica):
Here goes the real patch:
-Right tests (Doctests already run)
-`_insert_nextnew()` documented and tested
-The functions `covering_rad()` was merged with `covering_radius()`, this
function was already implemented but required optional GAP package guava.
Now you can indicate which method use. `Algorithm = "guava"` does the same
that
the old `covering_radius()` using guava. And `Algorithm = None` is my
implemented
function.
-The output of `weight_distribution_coset()` is now a tuple.
About making output of `groebner_representation()` immutable: This
function has been implemented
because in next step I'm going to use it for a decoding algorithm. And
actually it's going to be more convenient
to change the output to a dictionary, though.
I'll document more examples. I'm testing `coset_leaders()` to determinate
how big can be the length and dimension of the code before
the algorithm gets slow.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14973#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.