#14976: integration with non symbolic bounds broken
-------------------------------+--------------------------
       Reporter:  burcin       |         Owner:
           Type:  defect       |        Status:  new
       Priority:  critical     |     Milestone:  sage-5.12
      Component:  symbolics    |    Resolution:
       Keywords:  integration  |     Merged in:
        Authors:               |     Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A          |   Work issues:
         Branch:               |  Dependencies:
       Stopgaps:               |
-------------------------------+--------------------------

Comment (by nbruin):

 Replying to [comment:3 charpent]:
 > So ? If this was tre source of the error, it shouldn't happen with
 symbolic lower and upper bounds (see my slightly generalized example), but
 it does. Furrthermore, declaring the bounds as real allows for completing
 the task (bothh from maxima and from sage)...

 It's the source of the errors reported in the ticket. The problems
 reported in the ticket arise without interaction with maxima.

 You're diagnosing a different problem, that integration with certain
 ''symbolic'' bounds is ''also'' broken. Compare:
 {{{
 sage: var('x,t,a,b')
 (x, t, a, b)
 sage: function('f')
 f
 sage: function('g')
 g
 sage: integrate(f(x),x,a,b)
 integrate(f(x), x, a, b)
 sage: integrate(f(x),x,sin(t),b)
 integrate(f(x), x, sin(t), b)
 sage: integrate(f(x),x,sin(1+i*t),b)
 RuntimeError: ECL says: Error executing code in Maxima: defint: lower
 limit of integration must be real; found sin(%i*t+1)
 sage: integrate(f(x),x,g(t),b)
 RuntimeError: ECL says: Error executing code in Maxima: defint: lower
 limit of integration must be real; found g(t)
 }}}

 Indeed, for definite integrals, maxima seems to want to know if the
 integration bounds are real.
 However, Maxima seems to assume quite happily by itself that `a,b,sin(t)`
 are real, but doesn't think `sin(1+i*t)` is real and for some reason
 refuses to assume anything about `g(t)`.

 Your workaround is interesting in that it shows that maxima's "assume"
 facility can be of some help to nudge maxima into the desired direction.
 It seems to me the problem you're diagnosing is best addressed by working
 mainly on maxima. As far as I've seen, sage is offering reasonable input
 to maxima.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14976#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to