#14996: Improve support for Jacobi elliptic functions
-------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: eviatarbach | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Dependencies:
Stopgaps: |
-------------------------------+-----------------------------
Comment (by eviatarbach):
Ah, good. Should I submit a pull request on GitHub or something?
The reason I used real numbers for the inverse Jacobi is because it was a
pain to get continuity otherwise. For the amplitude function, it's defined
in the DLMF for real numbers (http://dlmf.nist.gov/22.16).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14996#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
