#12978: conditionally_defined decorator for methods and nested classes
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: jason
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-
Component: misc | wishlist
Keywords: categories, | Resolution:
conditionally_defined | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:8 SimonKing]:
> Replying to [comment:7 nthiery]:
> > For now I would go for the simplest: just use the documentation of the
> > method.
>
> Which of them? The one gotten from the super-class, or the one that will
only be there under special conditions?
The one defined under the special condition (as in my example above).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12978#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
