#10963: More functorial constructions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: stumpc5
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry | Reviewers: Simon King
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues: Reduce startup time
Branch: | by 5%. Avoid "recursion depth
Dependencies: #11224, #8327, | exceeded (ignored)".
#10193, #12895, #14516, #14722, | Commit:
#13589, #14471 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:91 nthiery]:
> Ok, from Volker's suggestion on Sage-devel, one can raise a similar
error message when garbage collecting the entries of a MonoDict (would be
the same with a tripledict) involves a big recursion because deleting an
entry triggers the deletion of another entry and so on:
This sounds like we need a different ticket. What do Python's weak
dictionaries do? Don't they have similar problems?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10963#comment:92>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
