#12183: absolute and relative norm functions for number field elements
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner: davidloeffler
MvanBeek | Status: positive_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-5.12
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Michiel Kosters, Angelos
number fields | Koutsianas
Keywords: | Work issues:
Authors: | Commit:
Monique van Beek | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by davidloeffler):
* status: needs_work => positive_review
Old description:
> Although number_field_element.pyx has a norm method, it does not have
> absolute_norm() and relative_norm(). This would be a useful shorthand to
> have.
>
> Apply [attachment:12183.3.patch].
New description:
Although number_field_element.pyx has a norm method, it does not have
absolute_norm() and relative_norm(). This would be a useful shorthand to
have.
Apply [attachment:12183_5.patch].
--
Comment:
The patch doesn't actually need rebasing. The problem here is that Michiel
made a new patch [attachment:12183_5.patch], and Angelos gave a positive
review to that patch, but the ticket description still said "apply
[attachment:12183.3.patch]". I have corrected the ticket description, and
verified that the latest patch does have a proper commit message and
applies without fuzz to the latest 5.12.beta2.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12183#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
