#15074: Allowing 'textbook style' derivative output from pynac
-------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: mbejger | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by mbejger):
I see your point, but still think that it would be good to have an option
for the Leibniz notation. Most of the time in physical applications the
variables are pure variables anyway, and for some reason, depending on the
context the user may decide to have such an output. Also, these notations
are equivalent in the sense that no new information is added or taken
away, it is just a matter of presenting them this of that way.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15074#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
