#9107: Nested class name mangling can be wrong in case of double nesting
------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: hivert | Owner: nthiery
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Simon King | Reviewers: Volker Braun, Florent Hivert
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: #12808 | Stopgaps:
------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:39 tscrim]:
> I don't think there is a to extend the nesting level since that is a
latex thing,
Shame on LaTeX!
> Anyways the fix for the pdf build is to remove a level (or two) of class
nesting.
What exactly are we talking about?
`Sets.WithRealizations.ParentMethods.Realizations`?
Interestingly, there is the comment
{{{
# Do we really want this feature?
}}}
So, can we do without this feature? Nicolas?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9107#comment:40>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
