#5918: [with patch; needs review] bring doctest coverage for posets to 100%
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: saliola | Owner: saliola
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-3.4.2
Component: combinatorics | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by ddrake):
Replying to [comment:6 saliola]:
> It seems that you are somehow typesetting the documentation. How do you
do this? That would obviously make it easier for me to catch these
mistakes.
Do {{{sage -docbuild reference html}}} to build the html reference manual,
and {{{sage -docbuild reference pdf}}} to make the LaTeX PDF version. The
reference manual pulls in all the docstrings from the Sage library. The
output will be in {{{$SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/doc/output/}}} and look in the
html or pdf directories. You can also create the developer's guide,
installation guide, and a bunch of other stuff by replacing "reference"
with "developer", "installation", "constructions", and others.
> Even though there are planned changes, I thought it was very much worth
the effort to add the doctests and fix the bugs in the current code.
Yes! Definitely.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5918#comment:7>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---