#15045: ATLAS: multiple definition of `ATL_SetAtomicCount'
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
       Reporter:  jdemeyer                       |        Owner:
           Type:  defect                         |       Status:
       Priority:  blocker                        |  needs_review
      Component:  packages: standard             |    Milestone:  sage-5.12
       Keywords:                                 |   Resolution:
        Authors:  Volker Braun                   |    Merged in:
Report Upstream:  Reported upstream. No          |    Reviewers:
  feedback yet.                                  |  Work issues:
         Branch:                                 |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                                 |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------

Comment (by nbruin):

 Congratulations on getting this fixed.

 Just for the record: I think the mutex code can still get built on
 platforms where no assembly alternative is available. In that case, I
 don't think we should particularly expect conflicting symbols either,
 because there are no other implementations available that the mutex code
 can conflict with in that case.

 This is why I figured it was best to patch the code that takes action
 depending on the tuning result and not the target in the makefile.

 The comment in the SPKG.txt doesn't strictly contradict this, but I had to
 read the comment a second time to convince myself of that.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15045#comment:29>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to