#5885: #5567 should throw a deprecation warning
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jason | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.0
Component: calculus | Keywords:
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* milestone: sage-3.4.2 => sage-4.0
Comment:
What alternate syntax for a region of this kind would be appropriate,
though? Anything requiring a lambda construction or a previous function
declaration seems awkward.
Perhaps the fix is to require variable declaration (e.g.
{{{
region_plot([y>0,x>0,x^2+y^2<3], (x,-3, 3),
(y,-3,3),plot_points=100,incol='gray').show(aspect_ratio=1)
}}}
but otherwise keep equify and friends. In particular, the current doctest
is too symmetric - better would be
{{{
region_plot([y>0,x>0,x^2+y^2<3], (x,-3, 4),
(y,-4,3),plot_points=100,incol='gray').show(aspect_ratio=1)
}}}
since otherwise it isn't clear that the correct variables are associated
with the correct input range otherwise.
I'm also changing the milestone to 4.0, concurrent with the Pynac switch.
If anyone posts a patch they can change it back :) I don't think it's a
blocker either, but will accept Jason's categorization in those terms due
to the switch.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5885#comment:1>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
