#15223: Let the `TestSuite` test that the construction of a parent returns the
parent
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: coercion | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/SimonKing/ticket/15223 | a81fcc1072df88cc369d7aa0b7ae423fd97d7f02
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
`IntegerModRing` is not mentioned in the discussion of #9138. But in the
patch, I found that providing the category as an additional argument used
to be a "todo". Namely, before #9138, we had this:
{{{
sage: FF = IntegerModRing(17, category = Fields()) # todo: not implemented
sage: FF.category()
Join of Category of fields and Category of finite enumerated sets
sage: TestSuite(FF).run() # todo: not implemented
}}}
So, this yields to the question: Why has it been a "todo"? Nicolas, did
you added this "todo"?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15223#comment:23>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
