#15247: Introduce a baseclass for singletons
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.13
Component: performance | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Simon King | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/SimonKing/ticket/15247 | add22e67c8eddafc7097aee8ee1b6883596a8a89
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:9 nthiery]:
> I won't have time to review this ticket, but I am all +1 on progress on
this direction. Just one thing: the priority is not as high than #10963,
and the two patches are likely to conflict with each other,
Why? My branch touches `sage.misc.fast_methods` and
`sage.rings.rational_field` and nothing else. I do not aim (yet!) at
changing `Category_singleton`, although it would make sense in the long
run (i.e., after #10963.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15247#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
