#14498: trees and binary trees
----------------------------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: elixyre | Owner: sage-
Type: enhancement | combinat
Priority: major | Status: needs_review
Component: combinatorics | Milestone: sage-5.13
Keywords: trees, binary trees, latex | Resolution:
Authors: Jean-Baptiste Priez | Merged in:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Branch: | Work issues:
Dependencies: #8703, #14784 | Commit:
| Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------------+----------------------------
Comment (by darij):
I have just uploaded [attachment:trac_14498-tree-imps-dg.patch] (to be
applied after [attachment:trac_14498-algorithms_trees-rebased.patch])
which should fix #15060 and clear up some of the vertex-vs.-node confusion
on binary trees. Can anyone look over it and tell me if I got things
right? I cannot really start reviewing this patch before this is sorted
out.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14498#comment:29>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
