#15161: Parent/Element relation for ChainComplex/Chain
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vbraun             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-5.13
      Component:  algebraic          |   Resolution:
  topology                           |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Volker Braun       |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  b2710cd06c2ef60044094f635ffb9bda29b5d45a
  u/vbraun/chain_complex_parents     |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jhpalmieri):

 On a quick reading of chain_complex.py:

 - Do you want to add your name to the `AUTHORS` list at the top of
 chain_complex.py?
 - In the docstring for `ChainComplex_class`, change {{{`base_ring`}}} to
 {{{``base_ring``}}}
 - In the docstring for `differential`, the spaces aren't lined up right in
 the indented part for `dim`. Same thing happens several other places. I
 guess I ought to be able to fix issues like this and then push them to a
 branch of my own. Meanwhile, I've attached a patch file with the changes.
 - In `betti`, well, first, I hope we are moving toward using CHomP as much
 as possible for homology computations. Given this, if we have a chain
 complex over a finite field, it may be faster to CHomP to compute its
 homology (hence its Betti numbers) than to use Sage to compute its
 homology over `Q` (which is a little strange anyway, if the chain complex
 is over a finite field). So the beginning part of the code might use the
 complex's base ring by default, if it's a field, rather than using `QQ` by
 default.
 - I wonder if we should deprecate the method `torsion_list`. Maybe this is
 more appropriate for a Sage worksheet than Sage source code; what do you
 think?

 I'll keep working on this.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15161#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to