#14862: Compositions accept any input
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  stumpc5            |        Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-5.13
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  composition,       |    Merged in:
  FindStat                           |    Reviewers:
        Authors:                     |  Work issues:  provide a test in the
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  constructor
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nbruin):

 Replying to [comment:13 darij]:
 > It is a class:
 > {{{
 > class Composition(CombinatorialObject, Element):
 > }}}
 Ah you're right. It wasn't in Sage 5.7.
 > Shouldn't a function "composition" be written in lowercase?
 That depends. If it's a "factory function" it's really meant to be a class
 constructor, but some implementation details prevented it from being
 written that way. So then the capitalization could still make sense. With
 that in mind it's more a judgement call whether to capitalize something.

 > It would slow things down, though... unless we change all calls to
 `Partition` via patchbombing.
 Do you have timings to back that up? It shouldn't (depending on what "It"
 is).

 If you mean using a `from ... import ... as ...` construction: that should
 lead to exactly the same performance. It just means the link in the
 relevant namespace dict is stored under a different key than would be
 chosen by default. There is no extra link step to follow.

 If you mean the extra redirection in a global namespace generic dispatch
 routine: yes, that would have a bit of overhead. But that's always the
 case: it's much better to use specific routines, that are likely not
 available directly from the global namespace.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14862#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to