#15150: Implement NCSym
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim            |        Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  enhancement       |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major             |    Milestone:  sage-5.13
      Component:  combinatorics     |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                    |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw  |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A               |  Work issues:
         Branch:                    |       Commit:
   Dependencies:  #15143, #15164    |     Stopgaps:
------------------------------------+-----------------------------

Comment (by zabrocki):

 I'm not sure if I should be too concerned because the doc tests are in a
 hidden function and they are there to test if that coercion doesn't work,
 not to demonstrate how to coerce between NCSym^*^ and Sym.  I tried to
 make it *slightly* clearer by changing the doc test.

 I also changed the following because I don't think it is right:
 {{{
     There is also a natural projection to the usual symmetric functions by
     letting the variables commute. This projection does *not* preserve the
     product nor coproduct stucture, but instead is just a module morphism.
 }}}
 I think the slice defined in `from_symmetric_function` does not preserve
 the Hopf structure, but the projection preserves both product and
 coproduct.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15150#comment:70>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to