#12521: evaluate log gamma for complex input
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
       Reporter:  kcrisman          |        Owner:  AlexGhitza
           Type:  defect            |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  critical          |    Milestone:  sage-5.13
      Component:  basic arithmetic  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  lgamma log_gamma  |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Eviatar Bach      |    Reviewers:  Burcin Erocal
Report Upstream:  N/A               |  Work issues:
         Branch:                    |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                    |     Stopgaps:
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):

 * status:  needs_review => needs_work


Comment:

 Also, it seems the algorithm for complex numbers is much faster than for
 real numbers, so we should probably use the complex algorithm for all
 inputs:
 {{{
 sage: a=RealField(53)(2.5); timeit('log_gamma(a)')
 625 loops, best of 3: 118 µs per loop
 sage: a=ComplexField(53)(2.5); timeit('log_gamma(a)')
 625 loops, best of 3: 112 µs per loop
 }}}
 {{{
 sage: a=RealField(10**4)(2.5); timeit('log_gamma(a)')
 5 loops, best of 3: 506 ms per loop
 sage: a=ComplexField(10**4)(2.5); timeit('log_gamma(a)')
 625 loops, best of 3: 782 µs per loop
 }}}

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12521#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to