#15360: Make RealIntervalField more reliable
-----------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: tmonteil | Owner: tmonteil
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.13
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: RIF | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
The first problem is I think a problem of the builtin max in Python (which
never fails).
For the second problem, you should use floor and not int. But anyway,
there is a bug in the function as x_interval.upper().floor() may fail with
a ValueError if the upper is infinity (line 582 and 583 in
sage/functions/other.py). I guess one should fix floor at that point.
Good luck!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15360#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
