#15432: Use a callback with a weak reference to WeakValueDictionary
---------------------------+----------------------------
   Reporter:  nbruin       |            Owner:
       Type:  enhancement  |           Status:  new
   Priority:  major        |        Milestone:  sage-6.0
  Component:  memleak      |         Keywords:
  Merged in:               |          Authors:
  Reviewers:               |  Report Upstream:  N/A
Work issues:               |           Branch:
     Commit:               |     Dependencies:
   Stopgaps:               |
---------------------------+----------------------------
 Following http://bugs.python.org/issue417795, we should probably only
 reference the dict weakly from the callback object to avoid unnecessary
 circular references.

 As we found in http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15367#comment:39, if an
 object C involved in a reference cycle becomes unreachable as a side
 effect of circular GC (e.g., a callback somewhere), the object C will only
 be collected by GC in the next round. A non-circularly referenced object C
 would have its reference count hit 0 and would be collected immediately.
 That is already a good reason to try and avoid circular references, even
 now that Python does clean them up eventually.

 See also http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13394#comment:19 (reasoning the
 validity of using a strongly referencing closure should be fine in theory
 -- this didn't take into account the practical consideration above).

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15432>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to