#14846: CycleIndexSeries derivative, integral, exponential methods are not
combinatorial
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: agd | Owner: agd
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.0
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Andrew Gainer- | Reviewers:
Dewar | Work issues: documentation
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/agd/cis/deriv | 5ce33898e941771132cdf94837a4baf16a2cfddb
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by agd):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
* commit: => 5ce33898e941771132cdf94837a4baf16a2cfddb
* branch: => u/agd/cis/deriv
* milestone: sage-5.13 => sage-6.0
Comment:
Skeletal doctests added for the three _lps_* functions. I have no idea
whether this is the *right* way to test this sort of method, but at least
it's *a* test.
Additionally, I've switched back over to using Git to manage this—the old
Mercurial workflow is just too confusing. How do I tell the build bot to
ignore the attachments and only use the branch?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14846#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
