#6011: [with patch, needs review] Bring plot/arrow.py to 100% coverage
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  kcrisman       |       Owner:  kcrisman
     Type:  enhancement    |      Status:  assigned
 Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  sage-4.0
Component:  documentation  |    Keywords:          
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------

Comment(by mvngu):

 REFEREE REPORT
 [[BR]][[BR]]
 The patch {{{trac_6011.patch}}} applies OK against the "post-final"
 version sage-3.4.2, all doctests pass with the options {{{-t -long}}}, and
 the doctest coverage is now 100% as claimed. Note that
 {{{sage/plot/arrow.py}}} is not included in the reference manual, so you
 can't search for it in order to view the documentation for
 {{{sage/plot/arrow.py}}}.
 [[BR]][[BR]]
 The patch adds some trivial inconsistencies in how "two-dimensional" and
 "three-dimensional" are abbreviated. These and other inconsistencies are
 fixed in the reviewer patch {{{trac_6011-reviewer.patch}}}. Apart from the
 issue of consistency throughout the whole module, positive review for
 kcrisman's patch. Only my patch needs to be reviewed.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6011#comment:3>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to