#15278: Hash and equality for graphs
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  SimonKing          |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-5.13
      Component:  graph theory       |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Simon King         |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/SimonKing/ticket/15278           |  c774057bf07b2da8539f2395555b2062428874f4
   Dependencies:  #12601             |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:11 ncohen]:
 > * About not requiring `allows_multiple_edges` and `allows_loops` to be
 equal :

 It will probably be fine to keep them in `__eq__`, as they simply ask for
 the backend's opinion, and the static backend hopefully has no changeable
 mind.

 > * About `.weighted()` : looks like the meaning of "weighted" is only
 used in
 >   `spanning_tree.pyx`. And I'd say that this can easily be replaced by
 an
 >   additional argument to the methods (as it is already the case in many
 others,
 >   like `flow` of `traveling_salesman_problem`)

 OK, but removing ".weighted()" from `__eq__` could be done later, I
 believe.

 > * I don't see any problem with using #12601. Do you see one ?

 Nope.

 > * Why didn't you use the decorators from your first immutable graph
 patch to
 >   deal with immutability in `.weighted()` ?

 With the decorator, an error would be raised whenever `.weighted()` is
 called on a mutable graph. However, `.weighted` only mutates the graph if
 it has an argument. `G.weighted()` will not change `G`, but will only tell
 whether `G` is weighted or not. I am not using the decorator in order to
 preserve this behaviour.

 Best regards,

 Simon

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15278#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to