#14912: UniqueRepresentation tutorial could use more love
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.13
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: documentation, | Merged in:
structure | Reviewers: Darij Grinberg,
Authors: Simon King | Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: #14888 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
Hey Simon,
With `sage-5.13.beta2`, I get:
{{{
sage -t unique_representation.py
**********************************************************************
File "unique_representation.py", line 822, in
sage.structure.unique_representation.CachedRepresentation
Failed example:
O is SomeClass(2)
Expected:
creating new instance for argument 2
deleting instance for argument 2
False
Got:
creating new instance for argument 2
False
**********************************************************************
File "unique_representation.py", line 826, in
sage.structure.unique_representation.CachedRepresentation
Failed example:
del O
Expected:
deleting instance for argument 1
Got:
<BLANKLINE>
**********************************************************************
File "unique_representation.py", line 828, in
sage.structure.unique_representation.CachedRepresentation
Failed example:
O = SomeClass(1)
Expected:
creating new instance for argument 1
Got:
<BLANKLINE>
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
3 of 89 in sage.structure.unique_representation.CachedRepresentation
[229 tests, 3 failures, 4.18 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t unique_representation.py # 3 doctests failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
}}}
with the following patches applied:
{{{
trac_15327-qfold-dg.patch
trac_15327-fixes-dg.patch
trac_15305-coercion_tensor_products-ts.patch
trac13394-weak_value_dictionary.patch
trac_15311-hall_algebras-ts.patch
trac_10963-more_functorial_constructions-nt.patch
trac_10963-more_functorial_constructions-graded-modules-fix-nt.patch
trac_10963_doctest_correction-fc.patch
trac_14102-nonsymmetric-macdonald.patch
trac9107_nesting_nested_classes.patch
trac_9107_fix_cross_reference.patch
trac_14685_bug_aorder_lazypowerseries.patch
trac_15150-ncsym-ts.patch
trac_15174-qfold1.patch
trac_15174-final-touches-dg.patch
trac_15174-review-ts.patch
trac14912-unique_doc.patch
trac_14912-comments-dg.patch
trac_14912-more-ts-dg.patch
trac_14912-doc-fixes-sk.patch
}}}
I don't think there's anything from the other patches which would cause
this to fail... Can someone check this on a later version of Sage?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14912#comment:53>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
