#15563: Illegal LaTeX in toric homset
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
vbraun | Status: needs_info
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.1
defect | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Simon King
documentation | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 7a83737b8e1275b28c1dd03e89f3dd66377a8617
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
u/vbraun/mathbbb |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by SimonKing):
* status: needs_review => needs_info
* reviewer: => Simon King
Comment:
The documentation builds fine with this branch and the one from #15562.
By the way:
{{{
sage: len(search_src('mathbb P', interact=False).strip().split('\n'))
1
sage: len(search_src('mathbf P', interact=False).strip().split('\n'))
7
sage: len(search_src('Bold P', interact=False).strip().split('\n'))
1
}}}
So, 18 bold votes against 133 blackboard votes. Should we try to generally
replace `mathbf` by `mathbb` when it is about the projective line, while
we are at it? Apart from this question, it is a positive review.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15563#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
