#15286: Latin squares
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  ncohen                 |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.1
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:         |    Reviewers:
  combinatorics          |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  a8a2a719d1f0fc4aedf24f24fc2c87e407182da4
  Nathann Cohen          |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  u/ncohen/15286         |
   Dependencies:         |
  #15285                 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 Helloooooo !!

 > Why this is not included to sage.combinat.matrix.latin_squares ? If you
 do not want to merge, you could at least make a reference.

 Because I did not know that this module existed when I wrote this one.
 "fortunately" they are unrelated : the
 `sage.combinat.matrix.latin_squares` module deals with operations specific
 to a given latin square, while this module builds "mutually orthogonal
 latin squares". I added a comment to the top of the file.

 > - The first line in the documentation is too large (146 columns).

 Fixed.

 > - line 112: "(cite theorem)" is not enough for the `ValueError` message

 `T_T`

 Sorry 'bout that. It is fixed. I thought this theorem has a name, but it
 is just a nameless one in the references I have, so I just replaced this
 text by `There exist at most n-1 MOLS of size n.`. And I added a doctest.

 > - optimization line 123: replace l == [] by not l

 Fixed. Assuming it was `p == []`.

 > - could you put the references lines 117 and 140 that are in comments
 and I would like better to see them in the documentation

 I do not understand your sentence very well `O_o`
 This being said, [Stinson2004] does appear in the documentation.

 > I will have a look at the mathematics next.

 Thaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanks. I'm very very thankful fo that, 'cause I love
 all this designs code and there does not seem to be many design lovers
 among Sage's devs' `^^;`

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15286#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to