#15205: NSym (NCSF): bugs or weird design decisions
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
       Reporter:  darij                          |        Owner:
           Type:  defect                         |       Status:
       Priority:  major                          |  needs_review
      Component:  combinatorics                  |    Milestone:  sage-6.1
       Keywords:  sage-combinat, NSym, NCSF,     |   Resolution:
  Sym, symmetric-functions                       |    Merged in:
        Authors:                                 |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                            |  Work issues:
         Branch:                                 |       Commit:
   Dependencies:  #15164                         |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by darij):

 * status:  new => needs_review


Comment:

 Hi Travis!

 I don't really plan to do anything on the ticket, and I don't think there
 is anything to be done on it either. I was keeping it around as a mental
 note to myself to make an NSym II patch once #15476 is merged and the
 coercion bugs are dead; by now it seems less and less likely to see the
 latter happen anytime soon, though. I can just as well use my mailbox for
 that, though.

 Greets and happy new year,\\
 Darij

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15205#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to