#15205: NSym (NCSF): bugs or weird design decisions
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner:
Type: defect | Status:
Priority: major | needs_review
Component: combinatorics | Milestone: sage-6.1
Keywords: sage-combinat, NSym, NCSF, | Resolution:
Sym, symmetric-functions | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: #15164 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by darij):
* status: new => needs_review
Comment:
Hi Travis!
I don't really plan to do anything on the ticket, and I don't think there
is anything to be done on it either. I was keeping it around as a mental
note to myself to make an NSym II patch once #15476 is merged and the
coercion bugs are dead; by now it seems less and less likely to see the
latter happen anytime soon, though. I can just as well use my mailbox for
that, though.
Greets and happy new year,\\
Darij
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15205#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.