#6036: [with patch, needs review] a bug in polynomial() for
PolynomialRing(GF(5),2)
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  klee              |       Owner:  Somebody  
     Type:  defect            |      Status:  new       
 Priority:  minor             |   Milestone:  sage-4.0.1
Component:  basic arithmetic  |    Keywords:            
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Description changed by klee:

Old description:

> This works:
>
> {{{
> sage: R.<x,y>=PolynomialRing(QQ,2)
> sage: a=x^2+x*y+y
> sage: a.polynomial(x)
> x^2 + y*x + y
> }}}
>
> But this does not work:
>
> {{{
> sage: R.<x,y>=PolynomialRing(GF(5),2)
> sage: a=x^2+x*y+y
> sage: a.polynomial(x)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ...
> TypeError: 'tuple' object cannot be interpreted as an index
> }}}
>
> The bug is essentially in:
> {{{
> sage: B=QQ[x]
> sage: print B({0:1,1:2})
> 2*x + 1
> sage: print B({(0,):1,(1,):2})
> 2*x + 1
> sage: B=GF(5)[x]
> sage: print B({0:1,1:2})
> 2*x + 1
> sage: print B({(0,):1,(1,):2})
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ...
> TypeError: 'tuple' object cannot be interpreted as an index
> }}
>
> I think the second form is not acceptable. Then the function
> remove_from_tuple() in sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial.pyx
> should be revised as it output (1,) from (1,2) for example

New description:

 The patch 12159.patch modifies the code in remove_from_tuple() in
 sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial.pyx. The patch 12160.patch adds a
 testing example in the docstring.

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6036#comment:2>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to