#15285: Bug in AffineGeometryDesign
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.1
defect | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 8468131a81898d5a3ccfb38d9f1a3d44df15fe10
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/15285 |
Dependencies: |
#15107 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by chapoton):
Looks good, but I do not understand the doctests about
`AffineGeometryDesign(3, 2, GF(2))`
Why do the parameters differ from the result of `is_block_design` ?
Is it because it is a 3-(something) design and not a 2-(something) design
?
If so, maybe you should rather use rather BD.parameters(t=3) ?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15285#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
