#14589: binary matrices, dense graphs, and faster is_strongly_regular
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:  jason, ncohen, rlm
  ncohen                 |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.1
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:  graph  |    Reviewers:
  theory                 |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  b56444ba216f3c2e6d7f20e34daf80f5d5aec781
  Nathann Cohen          |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  u/ncohen/14589         |
   Dependencies:         |
  #14805                 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 > Yes didn't you?

 Well if I did I do not remember where `:-P`

 > For me they are veeeery annoying so I assumed they were for everyone.

 Hmmmm.. It is true that a graph is a collection of pairs, and that you
 always have to explain "what the hell all these `None` are" when you show
 the result of `g.edges()` to beginners... `:-/`

 > Anyways, this is all I got to say about the patch. It looks good to me
 provided u changed the above things and ran the doctests (which I did not)

 Well the patchbot complains but the two errors seem unrelated.

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14589#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to