#15632: improving subgraph search
--------------------------------+------------------------
       Reporter:  azi           |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement   |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major         |    Milestone:  sage-6.1
      Component:  graph theory  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                |    Merged in:
        Authors:                |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A           |  Work issues:
         Branch:                |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                |     Stopgaps:
--------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by azi):

 Replying to [comment:6 ncohen]:
 > Yoooooo !
 >
 > > Now you can tell me if you wish we include this preprocesing thing or
 you see a better way to improve subgraph search altogether?
 >
 > Well, it would definitely be cool to have this available through a flag
 in `subgraph_search*`. Do you think it should be the default behaviour ?
 The answer to this most likely depends on the  average structure of input
 graphs which we do not know anything about. Hence its definitely something
 that the user should know. So yeah, a preprocessing flag looks like a good
 option, though I am not sure we lose that much performance by always doing
 the preprocesing phase.


 > Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15632#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to