#15361: Branching Rules for Exceptional Groups
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: bump | Owner: bump
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.1
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: bump | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/combinat/15361-branching- | faec22739d4590ddc1cc5d72490f5381fbb908fd
rules | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vbraun):
I see. I don't have a particular suggestion for method names...
`maximal_subgroups()` vs. `maximal_subgroups_table()`? A third option
would be to write a custom container for the subgroups that behaves like a
dictionary but prints like the table, though imho that would be
overengineered for the problem at hand.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15361#comment:61>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
