#10963: More functorial constructions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |        Owner:  stumpc5
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days54             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Nicolas M. Thiéry  |    Reviewers:  Simon King, Frédéric
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Chapoton
         Branch:                     |  Work issues:
  public/ticket/10963-doc-           |       Commit:
  distributive                       |  c718f218fbc726bf3cf7f4c3f20638c9b0c7eea7
   Dependencies:  #11224, #8327,     |     Stopgaps:
  #10193, #12895, #14516, #14722,    |
  #13589, #14471, #15069, #15094,    |
  #11688, #13394, #15150, #15506     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vbraun):

 The metaclass approach for inner categories as subcategories works now.
 I've switched it to attributes
 {{{#!python
 class FiniteCommutativeTest1(CategoryWithAxioms):
     __base_category_class__ = Test1
     __axiom_classes__ = frozenset([axioms.Commutative, axioms.Finite])
 }}}
 but inheritance from axioms works, too
 {{{#!python
 class Test2(Category):
     class FiniteCommutative2(InnerCategory, axioms.Finite,
 axioms.Commutative):
         pass
 }}}
 see
 
http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/tree/src/sage/categories/category_with_axioms.py?h=c520eb0bddcf6543d037dad3c7f0b808ae29b160

 I haven't implemented relations in the category manager, though one could
 keep that simple and leave more complicated things for later. One thing
 that I think is tricky is to derive rules from implications A => B => C =>
 A, especially if `all_super_categories` is actually missing some super
 categories.

 To answer your timeline question, I'd say less than a month.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10963#comment:499>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to