#14347: Implement group cycle indices
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  agd                |        Owner:  agd
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  cycle index,       |    Merged in:
  species                            |    Reviewers:  Martin Rubey
        Authors:  Andrew Gainer-     |  Work issues:  coverage, doctest
  Dewar                              |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  4cc6fafb26b9a1c069bac4511bf7017ec1a44041
         Branch:  u/agd/gcis         |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #14751, #14846     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by mhansen):

 It primarily just splits the internal functions into methods on a class.
 It also does not produce intermediate series for the linear combination
 (LinearCombinationStream vs. {{{sum(coeff*monomial_composer(part, g) for
 part,coeff in term)}}}).  {{{map_item}}} does the job building the dict
 and using {{{_from_dict}}}.  Let me know if you have any specific
 questions.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14347#comment:45>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to