#6044: [with patch, with review, needs second opinion] Enhanced reduction modulo
ideals of number fields
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mtaranes | Owner: somebody
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.0.1
Component: number theory | Keywords: number fields, ideals
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by cremona):
The patch applies fine to 4.0.alpha0, and all tests in
sage/rings/number_field pass.
There are some small glitches in the docstrings: in inverse_mod() in the
first line, N should be I. In reduce(), there is a formatting problem
which I think would go away if a space is inserted after the second ` in
`I`=self, and later on the single backquotes aroung small_residue should
be double. Ans some small indentation issues (which aer oly seen as
problematical when docbuild is used).
I fixed these things in the review patch (which also fixes a few minor
documentation issues I noticed that are nothing to do with this ticket as
such), but someone else should look at this too.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6044#comment:4>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
