#14403: Symbolic charpoly broken
-----------------------------+----------------------------
       Reporter:  nbruin     |        Owner:  burcin
           Type:  defect     |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major      |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  symbolics  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:             |    Merged in:
        Authors:             |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A        |  Work issues:
         Branch:             |       Commit:
   Dependencies:             |     Stopgaps:
-----------------------------+----------------------------

Comment (by rws):

 Replying to [comment:6 ppurka]:
 > Is there some general way of asking for the "next" symbol given some
 pattern? Essentially, emulating what a part of this patch does. Something
 which behaves like this:
 > {{{
 > sage: SR.next_variable('x') # suppose x, x0, x1 are already defined
 > x2
 > sage: SR.next_variable('x2')
 > x3
 > sage: SR.next_variable('x0y') # suppose that x0y is not yet defined.
 > x0y
 > }}}
 I have opened #15831 for this. Also, below is the patch, adapted to base
 it on 6.0.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14403#comment:23>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to