#12192: Improve doctest coverage of misc/fpickle.pyx
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: saraedum | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: trivial | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: doctest coverage | Resolution:
Keywords: sd35 | Merged in:
Authors: Julian Rueth | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/saraedum/ticket/12192 | 62aaf9a72d28cd787220698c6364efe7aee7df67
Dependencies: #11819 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by saraedum):
Replying to [comment:10 nbruin]:
> See #11845. Pickling involving python code objects are problematic,
because python code objects do not give the same portability guarantees
that proper pickling requires. It can still be very useful, though, and
the code on that ticket is a bit more robust in the face of closures etc.
Perhaps evaluate how much of #11845 we want and merge these two tickets?
Sorry, to be honest I don't understand. This just adds doctests to
existing code. How are these related?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12192#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
