#9320: Implement root numbers for elliptic curves over number fields
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  arminstraub        |        Owner:  cremona
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:
      Component:  elliptic curves    |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  root number        |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Tim Dokchitser     |    Reviewers:
  and group (Sage Days 22)           |  Work issues:  fix ReST formatting,
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  coverage
         Branch:  u/chapoton/9320    |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                     |  87938e0bdccc397f9527b1db39b9c85006f40232
                                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by cremona):

 I suggest that a good source of examples would be elliptic curves over
 number fields where we know the associated modular form, since the root
 number at a bad prime should match the Atkin-Lehner eigenvalue.  (The
 alternative would be to compue a whole lot of examples with Magma, but
 that would make me uncomfortable;  nevertheless we should of course check
 that our results are compatible with Magma.)

 There is no issue when the primes have multiplicative reduction, since
 then the root number is very easy being minus E.ap, i.e. depends only on
 whether the number of points on the reduction is p+1 or p-1 (of course "p"
 means Norm(p) in the number field case).  It's the case of additive
 reduction at primes dividing 2 or 3 which are harder.

 Here is one taken from my thesis (see http://www.numdam.org/numdam-
 bin/search?h=nc&id=CM_1984__51_3_275_0&format=complete):
 {{{
 K.<i>=QuadraticField(-1)
 E=EllipticCurve([1+i, 1+i, 0,i,0])
 P2=K.ideal(i+i)
 E.root_number(P2)
 -1
 }}}
 which I checked with Magma.  The conductor here is {{{P2^2 * P41}}}.

 Is this what you want?  How many examples do you need?


 Tables of elliptic curves over number fields do exist, and were in fact
 one of the topics of last week's Curves and Automorphic Forms workshop in
 Arizona.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9320#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to