#15920: Parallelize Possible Periods functions for Projective Morphisms
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  drose              |        Owner:  drose
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  algebraic          |   Resolution:
  geometry                           |    Merged in:
       Keywords:  Projective,        |    Reviewers:  Ben Hutz
  Morphism, Parallelization          |  Work issues:
        Authors:  Dillon Rose        |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  69dd970e65ad635573be4cc0cb0d8def1d442991
         Branch:                     |     Stopgaps:
  u/drose/ticket/15920               |
   Dependencies:  15966              |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by bhutz):

 * status:  new => needs_review
 * dependencies:   => 15966


Comment:

 These two changes looks fine. However, there is a third place that should
 be done in parallel.

 {{{periodic_points=self.lift_to_rational_periodic(pos_points,B)}}}

 in self.rational_periodic_points()


 Also, it is convention not to use CamelCase variables names. (i.e.
 parallelData, possiblePeriods should be not have the capital in them).

 I'm also marking 15966 as a dependency since without the cleanup of the
 child process these create too many child process to function well.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15920#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to