#15977: Fix formatting for symbolic summation algorithms
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/15977 | 4db919e1e824a650ff0f34e896641baf95b7f289
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
I like everything about your changes except the following. (I had
actually thought about doing this but figured I'd not want to cause merge
issues and also save for another ticket - but hey, here you've done it!)
{{{
- # verify that this operation does not modify the passed
dictionary (#6622)
+ Verify that this operation does not modify the passed
dictionary (:trac:`6622`)::
+
}}}
This is fine, but needs to be dedented. Note how it's exactly at the same
indentation level as the immediately following doctest.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15977#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
