#15949: Involutions on NSym and QSym part II
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  darij              |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  partitions,        |    Merged in:
  symmetric functions, NSym, QSym,   |    Reviewers:
  NCSF, Kronecker product,           |  Work issues:
        Authors:  Darij Grinberg     |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  5951b6d429c94fcba5f1c235be3465fdb845766a
         Branch:  public/combinat    |     Stopgaps:
  /invol-nsym-2                      |
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by darij):

 OK, so I don't have the time to prove this algorithm, but I see how it
 works and why it *should* work. Nice idea! I am not replacing the standard
 internal coproduct method since I don't know the complexities of the two
 algorithms involved, but it's certainly useful in its existing form
 already. I assume you're fine with my current changes?
 ----
 New commits:
 
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=5951b6d429c94fcba5f1c235be3465fdb845766a
 5951b6d]||{{{final edits}}}||

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15949#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to