#15947: Weaken types for _rmul_ and _lmul_
-------------------------------+------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim       |        Owner:  tscrim
           Type:  enhancement  |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major        |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  coercion     |   Resolution:
       Keywords:               |    Merged in:
        Authors:               |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A          |  Work issues:
         Branch:               |       Commit:
   Dependencies:               |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:2 tscrim]:
 > Oh, here's an idea. What about having the `ElementMethods` for
 `Algebras` inherit from `AlgebraElement`? This would give us the benefit
 of using the strongly typed speed of c(ython) but still using the category
 framework. I can do experiments if people think this is a good idea.

 I do, and in fact at some point I tried to use more of the "good old"
 Cython base classes in the category framework.

 One problem, if I recall correctly, is a bug in Cython (still not fixed if
 I recall correctly) that makes it possible to create a Python class C that
 inherits from two Cython base classes A, B, such that some methods of A
 trying to access cdef attributes of A get confused by cdef attributes of
 B. So, the Cython does not recognise that the class layouts are
 incompatible.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15947#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to