#15737: Problem in an_padic
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: wuthrich | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: elliptic curves | Resolution:
Keywords: padic l-functions | Merged in:
Authors: Chris Wuthrich | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/wuthrich/ticket/15737 | afe228dbcd688562d4aed0872376af918f67c023
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by wuthrich):
Hmmm. That would work as well indeed. However I have a slight preference
for my solution, because I think a) giving an insufficient precision
should raise an error rather than setting it arbitrarily to 5 and b) the
call from sha {{{an_padic}}} should do the right thing independently of
what {{{padic_lseries}}} would do with a meaningless argument.
But if you see a reason for doing a) your way, I have nothing against
changing it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15737#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
