#16048: dev docs: Inclusion Procedure for New and Updated Packages
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  rws                |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  documentation      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Ralf Stephan       |    Reviewers:  R. Andrew Ohanar,
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Jeroen Demeyer, Vincent Delecroix
         Branch:  public/spkg-       |  Work issues:
  devdoc-1                           |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                     |  42e05b1e7a1655e8c7b29712340e922029be05ba
                                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by rws):

 * status:  needs_work => needs_review
 * reviewer:   => R. Andrew Ohanar, Jeroen Demeyer, Vincent Delecroix


Comment:

 Thanks to all reviewers so far.

 Replying to [comment:11 vdelecroix]:
 > 1) There is a lot of intersection between your new section "Procedure
 for ..." and the "Prerequisites". It would make more sense to have only
 one.
 I will take the liberty to disagree here, for educational reasons.

 Everything else was fixed. Anything amiss in this section?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16048#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to